YET CHONG ELECTRIC COMPANY

BLK C-4, 13/F., WING HING IND.BLDG., 14 HING YIP ST., KWUN TONG, KLN, H.K.

TEL : (852) 23440137    FAX : (852) 23419016

Home page: http://www.ycec.com/   Email:  lzm@ycec.com

 

 Untied States Patent and Trademark Office

Art Unit 3644 Examiner

Washington, D.C.  20231                                                                                                                Fax:  1 703 306 4195

Re: US Patent Application No. 10/029,951                                                                                     DateOct.27, 2003  

                                                                                         

Dear Mr. Dinh

Thanks for given me 6 months for the second defenses.

           But in your second argument on the writing of examination, there are too many places that i do not understanding, therefore i do seek for your advice!

1.     In above-mentioned argue writing of page5 (the line of 11th):

          『Garehime discloses an aircraft anti-hijacking system having a concealed monitoring device to deter potential hijackers but lacks

                     the system to …  

  But, in the Garehime’s invention the word of “concealed” that was no find?  

2.     In above-mentioned argue writing of page5 (the line of 17th):

         『Feher discloses means to monitor the aircraft from the ground as well as “Flight Trajectory Calibrator 80” are well known in

                    the art.…  

But, the “Flight Trajectory Calibrator 80” of previous art. in Feher’s invention that was no find?

3.       In above-mentioned argue writing of page5 (the line of 18th)

        『Borthayre discloses a system to take control away from the cockpit to the ground system via a special frequency band is

                  well known in the art.  Borthayre inherently has a flight trajectory calibrator system to know where the aircraft is and going

                  so it can control the aircraft.

But, the “a special frequency band” and “a flight trajectory calibrator system” in Borthayre’s invention that was no find the words? 

The Borthayre’s invention lacked the remote-controlled automatic/semiautomatic steering ” and that was very important in

 the art.!

4.       In above-mentioned argue writing of page7 (the line of 4th) :

            『 Garehime as modified by Zekich, Feher, and Borthayre discloses all claimed parts of the invention except for

                        the narcotic sprayer used to put terrorists to sleep.  However, Boudreau discloses the use of narcotic sprayers

                       is well known in the art.

                      But, why the narcotic sprayer was no find in any previous art. by your search report? Boudreau, Who is he and how well

                      does   he know in the art.?

Why was there so much mistakes in the writing of examination?  Inventor thought that this should not be coming from professional level of Examiner !  Therefore inventor wants to ask Mr.Dinh can reply instruction!

  From following chart, the invent’s novelty of claim cannot be neglected by any reason, inventor doubted that there had been a shameful backstage force wanting to use the administrative means oppression Examiner make to exclude to eliminate the application of inventor:

 

The “single person checkroom” is a new and useful process than the previous

invention, the Claim of 1a & 2-6 novelty can confirm by the comparison:

 

Lin’s single person checkroom

Special beams of raster curtain for test

“Unidirectional” bullet-proof glass

Double door

program setting system

weight means

Five-finger mold hand test

Voice recognition

Image

test

Lin’s Novelty

novelty

Unidirectional

novelty

a new use of a known process

novelty

novelty

novelty

Zerick’s  checkroom

no

bullet-proof glass

no

no

 

 

no

no

Jacoby et al’s

no

no

no

no

out-of-

date

no

no

Anastassakis

no

no

no

different field

no

no

no

 

 The Claim of 1 b-c & 7-9 novelty can confirm by the comparisons

 

Lin’s

invention

concealed monitoring device!

flight trajectory calibrator system

Remote-controlled automatic/semiautomatic steering

narcotic sprayers

power supply of  independent and concealed

Lin’s novelty

concealed

no precedent

have no precedent

Have no

 precedent

have no precedent

Have no

 precedent

Garehime

monitoring device!

 

 

 

no

Borthayre

 

The story is

make up

 

 

no

Borthayre

 

 

not exist

 

no

Boudreau

 

 

 

Who is he?

no

 

 United States is a big country, it is ruled by law and the modern civilization also had good record, the prejudice had appeared to be a form of overdoing outside the art of examination.  Inventor asked for fair treatment and hopes that Mr. Dinh will pays attention- especially to the fact that the original two dotted lines and the two line that go between Fig. 1f & Fig. 4f was being omitted from reason why did the P. C of RABIN & BERDO. not file its reply before the deadline of Nov.14, 2002 points out that they are secretly trying to make the inventor unable to get the patent to !  Why must the inventor have to file it with speed post on his ownExaminer, Mr. Tien Quang Dinh, was an eyewitness that it is not an accidental incident but rather a violation of professional ethics. 

 In this caseInventor can offer the application of Agent’s letter by ShenZhen of china only.

 Examiner refer to inventor in addition that it will have what can do still?  Please in view the attached list of http://www.ycec.com/Defense-230903.htm and glance over the letter and amendment and to instruction the inventor how to makes the defense more perfectly!

Please reply by Email to lzmyc@singnet.com.sg , ycec@163.net, lzm@ycec.com

Thank you for your Kind attention.

 

Sincerely yours, 

Zhen-Man Lin

Attach http://www.ycec.com/Defense-230903.htm

attach 1

www.ycec.com/us-office-250603.pdf

 

attach 2

Amendment  (draft)

12-09-03

 

News figure: Fig1.  Fig.2    Fig.3   Fig.4  Fig.5   Fig.6

14-09-03

attach 3

ShenZhen  Agent Letter    Old-Fig.1 & Fig.4

15-07-03

attach 4

CN1408608A          Figure 1-5

 09-04-03