This attachment includes claims that are being rewritten in the
present amendment, with brackets being used to identify deletions from the
previous version of the rewritten claims and with underlining being used to
identify additions to the previous version.
1. (Amended) [Airliner] An
airliner hijacking prevention system [solution program] consists of the
following:
a. [The] A double-door
“single person checkroom” is that provides [the only entrance to the cockpit ;] a closed check space, allowing
only a single qualified person to access the cockpit and including first and
second doors that are to be connected open and closed positions of one another.
b. The cockpit and the ground monitoring center continuously monitor
the cabin through at least one [the] concealed electronic monitoring devices.
[forming a deterrent to potential hijackers;]
c. [With the] Flight [
locus monitor,] trajectory monitoring is provided by “ Flight Trajectory
Calibrator” and the ground-based monitoring center may switch manual steering
over to remote-controlled automatic/semiautomatic steering when the engineer on
the airliner loses his right to act.
2. (Amended) [Airliner] An
airliner hijacking prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim 1,
wherein said “[
Single ] single person checkroom” is the only entrance to the cockpit, and the [two] first and second doors are
opened and closed according to [the] a preset program .
3. (Amended) [Airliner] An
airliner hijacking prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim 1,
wherein said the double door, that is, the [front] first and [back] second
doors of the “single person checkroom” are equipped with unidirectionally
transparent bulletproof glass, shockproof plastic, or a naked eye viewing
window.
4. (Amended) [Airliner] An airliner hijacking
prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim 1, [wherein said
“single person checkroom”, which with preset program and closed space, one or
more identification means such as] further comprising detector means for
conducting at least one of a weight, image, voice, fingerprint or ID number [can be used
to the] test on a person in the “single person checkroom” to determine [of]
right of passage.
5.
(Amended) [Airliner]
An airliner hijacking prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim
4, wherein [said] the detector means for fingerprint identification [mean, that
is,] comprises a “five finger mold ”[,] which helps the “single person checkroom”
make identification. [almost unmistakably].
6. (Amended) [Airliner] An airliner hijacking
prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim 4, [wherein said the
identification of a single person in the “single person checkroom” is confined
to the] further comprising means for generating can to set the different frequency’s
beams of a raster curtain around the person in the “single person checkroom,”
and detector means for detecting whether the raster curtain has been breached .
7. (Amended) [ejector Airliner] An
airliner hijacking prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim 1,
[wherein said the “electronic monitoring device” can be connected to the] further
comprising narcotic [guns] sprayer installed at [the cross-shaped] a
passages of the [four entrances of
the plane.] aircraft,
the narcotic sprayer being responsive to the at least one monitoring device.
8. (Amended) [Airliner] An
airliner hijacking prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim 1,
wherein [said the system transfers] the airliner additionally has a cabin, wherein messages between the airliner
and the ground-based monitoring center are transferred through a relay
satellite or special frequency band, and [continuously monitors the cabin
through the] further comprising a concealed electronic monitoring device for
permitting the ground-based monitoring center to monitor the cabin and passenger cabin.
9. (Amended) [Airliner] An
airliner hijacking prevention system [solution program] as claimed in claim
1, [wherein said] further
comprising a remote-control [of the] plane [by] for use when the ground-based monitoring center is unable to control the airliner
normally due to poor
communication, in which case the[ standby] remote-control plane takes
off and controls the airliner. [ facilities.]