MARKED-UP SPECIFICATION
SYSTEM FOR PREVENTION OF [ THE NEWEST DEVICE FOR PRECAUTION]
SKYJACKING
Field of the Invention
The
present invention relates to a new [newest] device and system for
[precaution] thwarting skyjacking [and system].
Description of the prior art
The
suicide terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon with
huge civil airliners [astonish] astonished and [infuriate] infuriated
the world. “Are we safe?” is a
question raised by the people of Hong Kong as well as the USA, whose
enormous economic loss is shadowed by inner grief.
Sorrow
and anger are condensed into the words “Punish the terrorists!” [.]“Prevent hijacking!” is a paramount
task of governments in the future!
Sorrow and anger inspire the American people to tide over
difficulties with the government!
Although airports have resumed service, stricter [check makes] check-in
procedures make people even more anxiety-ridden. “Are we safe?” is a persistent
question. The Empire State
Building, overwhelmingly magnificent and believed to be the tallest in New York
now, is likely to be deserted by salary earners. Skyscrapers are now, expectedly and painfully, choking the
life of the economy.[.]
At
the US stock exchange, [is to open on Monday,] the shares of the
insurance companies involved [will fall] fell into disfavor. [Skyscraper] It is expected that
skyscraper syndrome will also entangle real estate shares.[.] Arrows shot from the dark are beyond
our capability to escape from. Who
is dominating the world now? The
current terrorists crisis tests the intelligence of US leaders, not America’s
military power. It is [but] a
common [imagination] goal, not just President Bush’s [insight] desire,
to spot the harbor of terrorists and get even with them. Airports are now under stricter
control, but is there anybody who can guarantee our safety and reassure
us? How can anxiety-ridden people
push the economy forward?
US President Bush has a bucket of sticky problems to tackle!
How
the New York Stock Exchange [will behave when it resumes operation can] behaved
is a measure of the extent to which the world [is] has been
affected by the [century] disaster of the century. What is essential is how to convince
people that such a disaster will not occur again[?]. People expect President Bush to come
out to assure them [before the Stock Exchange resumes operation].
["We
have found a plan to prevent hijacking.
We will issue, discuss and carry out the plan!] The strict and unpleasant [check] check-in
procedures at airports [is] are expected to ease after [the plan is]
plans for preventing hijacking are implemented. The pain is temporary because [we are] the
civilized world is powerful in our production and technological
capabilities. The disaster will
never happen again! The people of
the United States and around the world will no longer live in the shadow of
terrorism! May the victims of the
disaster rest in peace. We’ll let
terrorists know that human civilization is not to be trespassed upon!["]
The
world is waiting. And [we] it
is strongly [believe] believed that [the above four] effective
plans [are effective in] for preventing hijacking by improving the
structure of the airplanes and setting up corresponding procedures can be
devised. It is reported that
people working in the Empire State Building feel quite upset because of their
being “outstanding”. Acrophobia is
spreading! Without plans to end
hijacking, the shares of airlines, insurance, real estate and tourism will fall
into disfavor. Fear will lead to
economic turbulence and downturn.
We expect President Bush to come out with strong measures and assure
people that all evils will be conquered!
The
unprecedented disaster heralds the beginning of [the] a life-and-death
struggle between the evil and the civilized community. With a sense of mission, the inventor
faxed [the] a creative hijacking prevention device and system proposal,
as well as the above [background materials] considerations, to Mr. Liu
of the USA Embassy in Hong Kong on September 19, 2001, who forwarded
them to the [white house] White House and President Bush.
At
four o’clock on September 26, 2001, Mr. Liu told the inventor over the phone:
“I would like to thank you on behalf of the government of the USA...” On September 27, 2001, President Bush
aired three safety measures for civil aviation. It is anticipated that Mr. Bush will [expectedly]
take resolute actions to implement these measures and launch a campaign to
conquer the evil! [In the above
Proposal to President Bush on Four Hijacking Prevention Solutions, solutions II
and III are combined into one.] It
is gratifying to note that President [Bush made some revisions and came up
with the] Bush’s three safety measures for civil aviation are similar
to ones that were proposed by the inventor.
On
October 22, 2001, the Patent Bureau of China finished an international
patent inspection report concerning [the] an application for [the] a
patent [of] on “Measures on the Prevention of Hijacking of Civil
Airliners”. This report lists six
[successful cases and] references for gauging the originality that a
[patent] patentable technique should have. It is these six [cases] references that set off not
only the originality of this patent application, but also its
flawlessness!
The reference numbers of the six [cases] references in the Inspection Report are listed below:
|
|
Relativity [y] |
Country |
Reference No. |
Requests for rights |
International patent No. |
|
1 |
1 |
CN |
A,85100918,
B64CA/14 |
1-3 |
B64 |
|
2 |
Y |
CN |
A,1126686,
B64D25/00 |
1-2 |
B64 |
|
3 |
Y |
CN |
A,1038434,
B64D25/00 |
1-2 |
B64 |
|
4 |
Y |
US |
A,3704845,
B64C1/10 |
1-2 |
B64 |
|
5 |
Y |
JP |
A,9-036791,
H04B7/15 |
3 |
B64 |
|
6 |
Y |
JP |
A,9-020297,
B64D47/00 |
3 |
B64 |
1. Patent No.
CN85100918a
Patent owner: Mr. Yi Ming and Mr. Shen Xinhua of Mashan
Surveying and Mapping Team, Jinxian County, Jiangxi Province.
Patent name: Airliners with Anti-Hijacking Function Dec. 20, 1985
[What is claimed is:]
The following three major technical
features of this invention are [to be patented.]:
1. Walls and doors with
new functions: using new materials to make the walls and doors capable of
sustaining heavy impacts and gunfire.
2. Two different types
of “[Safety] safety cockpit” designed to prevent hijackers from entering
the cockpit, thus ensuring normal flight of the airliner.
3. [Alarm] An alarm
device designed to keep people informed whether safety door of the cockpit is
open or closed.
The first technical feature is designed in
light of the following:
(1) Using
bulletproof high-performance materials to make isolating boards.
(2) Double-bar-shaped,
spear-shaped and blade-shaped screws designed to fix the isolating boards and
prevent hijacking.
(3) [External] An
external framework with “metal blades” designed to fix the isolating boards
and prevent hijacking. Aluminum
alloy materials are shaped like knives or saw-teeth, giving the “metal
blades” extra power.
The second technical feature is designed in
light of the following
(1) Safety
isolating walls with no doors and permanent safety cockpit.
(2) A
transit [Transit] room and impermanent safety cockpit.
(3) Transit
room temperature including how to enter the cabin from the cockpit and vice versa.
The third technical feature is designed in
light of the following:
(1) An alarm
[Alarm] device used to keep the crew informed whether the doors of the
cockpit and cabin are open or closed.
The alarm device may consist of an indicator, flashlight and
buzzer.
(2) Spring
switches designed to connect or disconnect some circuits according as whether
the safety bolts are plugged or unplugged.
(3) Synchronized
switches designed to make the alarm device automatically operate when the
airliner is started.
2. Patent CN
1126686A
Patent owner: Mr. Wang Honghua, Shangyuetang
Construction Section, Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, 412000
Patent name: Airliner Anti-Hijacking System,
January 12, 1995
[What is claimed is:]
The application of Mr. Wang Honghua is
basically the same as No. 88103336.7 patent CN 1038434A of Mr. Zhang Hua and
Mr. Zhou Guangyuan of Beijing.
This invention adopts an automatic monitor to transfer messages,
but it is installed only in the airliner.
The inventor treats the airliner full of passengers as [the] a
battlefront.
1. The
inventor [designs] proposes to install the alarm device in the cockpit,
but fails to explain how the alarm device identifies hijackers.
2. He
points out that a “digit-key alarm device” is now available in China,
explains how the alarm device can exactly count the hijackers, how may cameras
are needed to cover every corner of the airliner, how to identify overlapped
images, and how to spot disguised hijackers. The 0-9 keys are intended to notify the control (operation)
room [to press] by pressing
6 or 7 when 6 [0] or 7 hijackers are counted. Then what about 11 hijackers? The story is not convincing first because of the irrational
design of the alarm device!
3. The
inventor [designs] proposes to equip the plane with auto-aim guns that
are synchronous with the small video cameras, transferring messages to the
control room. His [patent]
invention does not ensure the safety of the hostages. [Auto-aim] The auto-aim technique is rather [complicate]
complicated. The
“anti-hijacking” function claimed by the inventor will fail if the hijackers
hold just one hostage or makes a smoke screen.
3. Application
88103336.7 CN 1126686A
Patent owner: Mr. Zhang Hua
Address: No. 8, Bldg. 2, behind Yong An Dong Li Primary School, Jian
Guo Men Wai, Chaoyang District.
Patent name: Anti-Hijacking Device Installed on
the Aircraft
January
3, 1990
[What is claimed is:]
A TV monitor, striker, gun barrel and gun
head on the operation desk designed by the Beijing inventor can’t prevent
hijacking. They are just
mechanical or shooting devices, which can do nothing when terrorists hold any
hostage. Patent 88103336.7 CN
1126686A is by no means the same as [Mr. Zhen-man Lin] the present
inventor’s hijacking-prevention solution.
4. Application
US A,3704845, B64C 1/10
Patent owner: Michael Ord, 5267 Wilkins Avenue, Pittsburgh,
Pa.
Dec.
5, 1972
Patent name: AIRPLANE HIJACKING PREVENTION
SYSTEM
[Abstract of disclosure:]
A method and system for
preventing airplane hijacking features the following:
1. The cockpit is
isolated from the cabin to give passengers a sense of safety, but communication
must be ensured. The buttons fixed
in the cabin keep the cockpit informed of such things as oxygen shortage, fire alarm,
medical accident, device fault and any other trouble.
2. The isolating door
between the cockpit and the cabin is restricted, and the door and its
associated isolating walls are made of bulletproof materials.
3. The voice
communication system of the audio system is a one-way system from the cockpit
to the cabin, preventing the words of the hijackers from being heard.
4. This invention warns
the passengers in advance.
The key idea of the patent is that the
pilots are locked in the cockpit so that the hijackers cannot communicate with
the pilots. Even if the hijackers
hold any hostage, the pilots will not open the cockpit without hearing
anything. Even if the hijackers
hold any hostage, the pilots will not open the cockpit without hearing
anything. Even if the hijackers do
as indicated in Fig. 4 [22] of the reference, the pilots may choose to
stay if the situation is not critical.
5. Application
JP,A,9-036791, H04B7/15
(19)
Franchise Office of Japan (JP) Issued on Feb. 2, 1997
Inventor: Decheng
Changzhi
Address: No. 1 Bldg. 1 Dingmu 2, Xiaogu, Hanchuanding, Gaozuo Shire,
Kangawa
Patent
name: A Support Device Using Satellite Communication to
Prevent
Hijacking
The inventor designed the support device
using satellite communications to prevent hijacking. The device keeps [the] a ground monitoring center
informed of hat is going on in a hijacked airliner by means of satellite
communication.
[Solution:]
In case of hijacking, the passengers or
aircrew press [the] emergency buttons fixed at various places in the airliner,
[the] and a video camera with long or short lens installed at an
appropriate place begins to work, digitizes the information by means of an
image processing device or turns the information into FX (facsimile) file
format, and then sends the information to the ground monitoring center via the
satellite. The ground monitoring
center in turn sends information via the satellite to the camera so that the
camera adjusts the foci and angles of the long and short lens. In addition, dialogs may help to solve
hijacking.
What [is claimed] the reference proposes
is:
1. Fix several cameras
at places with a good field of vision and install a monitor in the cockpit to
monitor the cabin, and receive information from the communication satellite and
transfer it to the ground monitoring center through the support device.
2. Record the
information of the satellite for the use of the emergency communication device. Use the image processing device to
digitize the information or turn the information into FX (facsimile) file
format and then send it to the ground monitoring center.
3. Fix emergency
buttons in the cockpit and the cabin, which serve to start the support device
so that the ground monitoring center can monitor what is going on.
6. Application
JP,A,9-020297, B64D47/00
(19)
Franchise Office of Japan (JP) Issued on January 21, 1997
Inventor: Youdong
Gongqi
Address: No. 1,
Zhizituju 1467, Zuoboding, Zhedao
Patent: Support
Device for Hijacking Prevention
Application JP,A,9-020297, B64D47/00 is
exactly the same as JP,A,9-036791, H04B7/15. It is strange that both of them should be approved. Both use satellite communication to
achieve the same purpose. Both are
different from the hijacking prevention system. [Item 3 of Mr. Zhen-man Lin] One item of the present
inventor’s hijacking prevention system solution features a detailed and
original arrangement for remote control of the airliner. Therefore, we can easily come to the
conclusion that application JP,A,9-020297, B64D47/00, just like JP,A,9-036791,
H04B7/15, [cannot prevent the generation of Mr. Zhen-man Lin] would not have
led to the present inventor’s prevention system solution.
SUMMARY
OF THE INVENTION
The
disadvantages of prior art are overcome by the present invention[, following is
their disadvantages and solutions from the present invention:]. The following are their
disadvantages and the solutions provided by the present invention:
[the] The features of CN 85100918A include the following:
1. Shockproof isolating
walls with or without doors, featuring bulletproof materials (unidentified yet)
and heterogeneous screws fixing isolating boards.
Comments: Over one hundred
years’ development of aircraft leads to different performance concepts of
isolating-wall technique and bulletproof performance. This patent technique is open to all aircraft manufacturers.
2. Permanent doorless
design or entering impermanent safety cockpit through the “transit [room".]
room.”
Comments: [Application] The
application for patent does not depend on the failure or success of a
permanent doorless design. The
safety conditions of the “transit room” are monitored through a peephole. The right of passage through the “transit
room” is subject to the perception of the aircrew, which is a time-honored
concept! What is strange is that
the most recent application for patent was made in 1985, but there weren’t the
sophisticated automatic detection tools already available in the 1970s, so that
patent CN 85100918A lacks the originality essential to any patent! The inventor has further modified the
design from double-wall double-door to double-wall three-door (Figure 9). Short of automatic detection tools,
however, more doors are of no avail!
A knife is enough for the terrorists to force the aircrew to take them
through the “transit room” to the cockpit! Therefore, no one has used patent CN 85100918A. The inventor is fully aware of that and
so identifies his invention as an impermanent design.
3. The third patent
feature of CN 85100918A is the alarm device designed to keep people informed
whether the safety door of the cockpit is open or closed.
Comments: Page 7 is
highlighted by the patent staff:
(1) The alarm device consists only of an indicator, flashlight
and buzzer. It serves to notify
whether the doors are properly closed.
But the then-popular infrared sensor is not used, so how
could such an alarm device be sophisticated? (2) The safety lock is even or outdated. It is intended to lock the door of the
cockpit, with the key to be kept by the captain. What the terrorists need to do is steal
the key (without needing to kill the captain) and enter the cockpit. (3) The shield of the peeping device is
intended to prevent terrorists, who may look into the cockpit through the
peephole, from shooting at pilots.
If the terrorists are determined to shoot, chain switches may serve the
same purpose. In addition, convex
lens, widely used in stores and shops, may better serve the purpose. Therefore, using a shield is
like carrying coals to Newcastle!
Patent
CN 85100918A is defective. The 19th-century
technology was not to blame for its inability to prevent hijacking. The scarcity of practical
anti-hijacking techniques sets off the originality of this patent
technique. For example, image
identifier, identification through sound spectrum, and use of five-finger mold
instead of that of a single finger.
The application of this patent system solution will help eradicate
“hijacking”!
Patent CN1126686A may be
virtual, but it does not befit a civilized society to turn an airliner into a
battlefield. Unlike patent CN
1126686A, which features [“anti-hijacking",] anti-hijacking,” [Mr..
Zhen-man Lin patent] the present inventor focuses on the prevention of
hijacking, and therefore his patent application is justifiable.
Patent 88103336.7 CN 1126686A
is by no means the same as [Mr. Zhen-man Lin] the present inventor’s
hijacking-prevention solution. Having
been widely used, a TV monitor is [not a patent] but an auxiliary
[method] feature. It is not
the key to [Mr. Zhen-man Lin patent] the present inventor’s
solution to hijacking prevention.
It does not befit a civilized community to ignore the safety of
passengers and turn an airliner into a battlefield. Therefore, [Mr. Zhen-man Lin] the present inventor
believes that application 8810336.7 is not truly valid.
Drawbacks of patent US A,3704845, B64C 1/10
1. The
US patent invention does not allow for any possible neglect of the pilots.
2. The pilots
may not come even if all buttons in Fig. 4 [22] of the reference are
pressed.
3. Are the bulletproof
wall and door of the cockpit soundproof?
The hijackers know perfectly well how to raise hell, and they [will] may
kill one person every five minutes until the pilots come out!
[5] 4. The pilots may rely on their unreliable
perception and reasoning to decide whether to open the door of the cockpit[,];
therefore the US patent invention is inadequate to deter hijacking.
The US patent invention in 1972 has drawn
upon the experience of the previous three patents of China but still leaves
much to be desired. By contrast,
the double-door structure [specified in Mr. Zhen-man Lin patent] proposed by
the present inventor is original, the “[Single] single-person
checkroom” is a natural evolution of modern technology, and the five-finger
mold is unprecedented. The
single-person checkroom of the double-door structure precludes the effect of
human factors and the five-finger mold makes the system flawless. [The hijacking prevention system of Mr.
Zhen-man Lin is so original that the US patent application does not affect the
patent application of Mr. Zhen-man Lin.]
[As
the name implies,] The present invention [is] can also serve as a
support device to prevent hijacking through satellite communication! [The idea is good enough but not
specific yet.] Its merit is that
the support device can be used for negotiation and monitoring!
It
is recommended, in [Item 3 of Mr. Zhen-man Lin] one item of the present
inventor’s hijacking prevention system solution that, apart from using
satellite communication for negotiation and monitoring, manual piloting should
be disabled while automatic piloting is enabled until the airliner
touches down, thus deterring hijacking.
There lies [the originality] a primary feature of the
invention! Satellite communication
is not the patent right of application JP,A,9-036791,H04B7/15, but instead the
right of the owner and inventor of the satellite! What makes the difference is how to use satellite
communication to achieve different purposes. [Item 3 of Mr. Zhen-man Lin] The present inventor’s
hijacking prevention system solution features a detailed and original
arrangement for remote control of the airliner. Therefore we can easily come to the conclusion that
application JP,A,9-036791,H04B7/15 [cannot prevent] would not have led to
the generation of [Mr. Zhen-man Lin] the present inventor’s hijacking
prevention system solution.
Application
JP,A,9-020297,B64D47/00 is exactly the same as JP,A,9-036791,H04B7/15. It is strange that both of them should
be approved. Both use satellite
communication to achieve the same purpose. Both are different from the present inventor’s
hijacking prevention system, which [Item 3 of Mr. Zhen-man Lin hijacking
prevention system solution] features a detailed and original arrangement for
remote control of the airliner.
Therefore we can easily come to the conclusion that application
JP,A,9-020297,B64D47/00, just like JP,A,9-036791,H04B7/15, [cannot prevent] would
not have led to the generation of [Mr. Zhen-man Lin] the present
inventor’s hijacking prevention system solution.
[Obviously,
the present invention provides not solutions of problems of prior art, but
newest and most safe device for precaution skyjacking and system!]
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig.
1 is a [graph] drawing that shows the hijacking prevention system and
device.
Fig.
2 is a flow chart of the airliner hijacking prevention system.
Fig.
3 is a program block diagram of a single person checkroom security
system.
Fig.
4 is a [graph] drawing that represents the construction of a
series of security checking system.
DETAILED
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
A. Improvement of Airplane
Structure and Establishment of Corresponding System Program:
1. As shown in
[FIG.1-1] Fig. 1, [install "Single] at reference number 1, a
“single person checkroom” path structure is installed to make it
impossible for terrorists to enter the cabin. [The structure of checkroom must
in order to precaution against that to bump and to pick out of..]
2. [As shown in FIG.2] With
reference to Fig. 2 of the systematic program, [install] an
independent concealed electronic monitoring device is installed. It is not controllable by but is
visible to the aircrew. [Special] A
special waveband transfer enables a ground-based monitoring center
to have full control of terrorists and negotiate with them easily.
3. [As shown in
FIG.1-3] With reference to Fig. 1, at the four passages of the
[entrances] entrance 3 of the airliner, [install] remote-controlled
chemical spraying guns and appropriate obstacles are installed to
control or restrict the activities of terrorists. A narcotic sprayer may also be installed.
4. [As shown in FIG.2] With
reference to Fig. 2, nothing is worse than when the pilot takes a
hand in hijacking, but in this case a “flight [orbit ] Trajectory
Calibrator,” or flight path specifying unit, can be used to lock
the flight course, under the remote control of the ground-based
monitoring center. In Fig. 2,
notations such as “Fig. 1-5” indicate reference number 5 in Fig. 1.
5. [As shown in FIG.2] With
reference again to Fig. 2, the ground-based monitoring center has special
plane with a monitoring device, ready to fly and trace. Or satellite relay stations may
transfer monitoring messages.
6. Set flight discipline for the
aircrew.
B.
[FIG.3 is
shown, applications of] Fig. 3 shows the Facilities and Features of the
System Program:
(1)
[Add passage]
Passage checkroom structure and system setting:
.a [FIG.1-a & b. are shown, install ]Two unidirectionally transparent
bullet-proof glass doors are hiden as shown in Fig.1 a & b. When
closed , the doors push out from the dotled line of Fig.1 f,
Fig1.r. shown the
check place which is enclose
by closing two the doors. from
the cabin to the passage as a second door, so that the pilot can see the
passage unidirectionally, making hijackers conscious of someone looking at them
in the dark.
b.
Fig.4 f are [As] shown [in Fig.4 a & b, the back and from
panels] install hiden
in a and b of the bullet-proof glass door are both
unidirectionally transparent, when they
push on and closed,
with a 0.8-1 meter
single person checkroom in between[,]. Fig. 4 [c. is shown] also shows a detector c
of a raster curtain,[; FIG.4 d. is shown], a detector d for
identifying weight[;], [FIG.4 e. is shown] [and] a detector [of] e
for a password card[;], [FIG.4 h is shown] a detector h of
[Five-finger] a five-finger mold test[;], and a [FIG.4 i.]
detector [of Image test] i for
an image test. [FIG.4 j. is shown a] Fig. 4 also
shows a detector j of human body infrared[;], [FIG.4 k. is
shown] a laucher k of special beams for the raster curtain, and a
[FIG.4 l. is shown] detector [of] l for voice recognition[; they will
be]. These detectors
automatically identifying weight, a password card, [fingerprint] fingerprints,
and an image, and provide a voice test. Although FIGS.1 and 4 show elements c,
d, h, i, k, and L at positions offset from the “single person checkroom” that
is provided between and enclose by closed two the doors.
c.
As shown in
[FIG.2] Fig. 2, the front and back panels are closed under the double
control of closing instructions of an airplane in flight status and the
ground-based monitoring center, meanwhile turning on the automatic identifier.
d. As [FIG.2 is shown] Fig.
2 shows, the aircrew must get permission via communication and a
password card instruction to open the first door and enter the checkroom, and
the automatic identifier, after sensing only one person in the checkroom,
closes the first door and begins to check.
e. As shown in [FIG.3] Fig.
3, after the automatic identifier checks that only a single person
[only] is present and makes ID identification, the cabin, on being
notified of the ID of the approaching person, decides whether to open the
second door. The first door will
not open until the second door closes, thus preventing hijackers from swarming
in.
f. Persons in the
cabin will be documented by the captain and the monitoring center
respectively when the automatic identifier is started. There must be at least one engineer in
the cabin; otherwise no person can pass the checkroom, except in
non-flight status of the plane or by obtaining instruction from the monitoring
center.
g. If any person in the
cabin wants to leave the cabin during flight, a simple password card can be
used to open the second door and enter the checkroom, and the automatic
identifier in the checkroom instructs [to close] the second door to close
and begins to check. The first
door can be opened only after the check.
h. The automatic
identifier sets the number of persons in the cabin and decides that at least
one engineer must stay in the cabin during flight.
i. Problems and
solutions:
1. The automatic identifier
restricts the number of persons in the checkroom, making it impossible for
hijackers to enter the checkroom together with the aircrew. A hijacker may only enter under
disguise, but the automatic identifier may have identification combinations,
such as the weight, fingerprint and palm print and voice. The unidirectionally transparent glass
door fully exposes hijackers, but it is necessary to equip a back-view
mirror for the engineer or formulate a review system to increase the
weight of manual check.
2. Why use the five-finger mold? Because a single finger may be cut, but if the whole hand is cut, it will be impractical and unnecessary to use modern technology to make a frozen cut hand resume its original appearance in the short time and limited space. This makes the system flawless.
3. Even if the engineer and
aircrew are hijackers, who can freely pass the [Single] single person
checkroom, they are restricted by [2.(3) Lock] a locked flight course by
means of the flight trajectory [locus] calibrator.
(2) Independent concealed electronic
monitoring device:
The historic disaster of the World
Trade Center shows how defective the designs of airplanes are: the hijacking shut down all communications
facilities so that their identities [remain] remained a mystery. The black box cannot provide real-time
on-site video and audio recordings, making it almost impossible to find and
punish those behind the terrorist acts.
[As
shown in FIG.1-4, the airplanes] Airplanes are not equipped with
independent concealed video and audio electronic monitoring equipment and
real-time transfer and storage equipment, which (if any) cannot be controlled
by the aircrew. This is ridiculous
today, when technology is so sophisticated and the space is studded with
satellites. No doubt, the US
aviation security bureau cannot pass the buck.
Therefore,
it is imperative that an independent concealed electronic monitoring
device 4 should become a standard device of an airliner. Some people my claim that their privacy
is encroached upon, but the monitoring on the channel is within the permitted
range. And so the independent
concealed electronic monitoring device may somewhat deter potential hijackers.
(3)
[Lock] A
locked flight course by means of flight [locus] Trajectory
Calibrator:
a. As shown in [FIG.2] Fig.
2, in case the flight [orbit] trajectory deviates from the preset
course, the calibrator [(FIG.1-6)] 6 (see Fig. 1) will surely use
the alarm functions of [channel feedback center of] the electronic monitoring
device.
b. With the
flight [orbit] Trajectory
Calibrator 6, the ground-based monitoring center may switch
manual steering over to remote-controlled automatic/semiautomatic steering (not
beyond the present technology) when the engineer loses his right to act. A remote-control plane may be
provided so that it can take off and take control of the airliner in the event
the signal from the monitoring center lacks sufficient coverage.
c. It is advisable to
draw upon the high-air remote control technology of air scouts. The security of a hijacked plane may
somewhat be affected by geographical and atmospheric conditions, but “remote
control” can bring the hijacked plane to “an automatic flight status" and
thus absolutely prevent the plane from suicide attack on downtown areas or
landmark buildings. For example,
the plane can be made to safely rise and fly away from the downtown area and
enter into “remote-controlled steering status", thus winning time for the plane to enter the preset
course. Decades of successful
applications of automatic pilot technology have made us fully convinced
of its security.
d. Confidentiality of
remote control information is no problem in today’s digitized age.
(4) The ground-based monitoring
center [has] should have a special plane with a monitoring
device, ready to fly and trace.
The ground-based special remote-controlled plane prevents an accident
plane from flying out of the direction radius.
(5) Set flight discipline for the aircrew:
a. It is necessary to
strictly comply with the discipline set by the structure and program of the
channel calibration room so as to preclude any hijacking.
b. Make the engineer
more capable of tackling emergencies, mainly with portable non-fatal
chemical weapons.
From
the description above, [shows] the excellence and [characters] characteristics
of the present invention will be apparent:
1. The Measure Plan of
this patent application centers on structural techniques;
2. Various combinations
of available classifiable techniques are used in the Measure Plan;
3. The Measure Plan is
quite comprehensible. Except the
remote-controlled transmissions, which are encrypted, all the rest is
open to the public, thus serving as an effective deterrent to hijackers;
4. Even though the
above Measure Plan leaves much to be certified and improved, it comes right to
the point if considered from the perspective of the global economy; and
5. It is likely for the Americans to accept the plan, because they have their own thoughts and judgments! They will regain confidence in safety and overcome their fears incurred by the disastrous attacks. The global economical order is soon to return to normal!
The
use and networking of “ flight[ locus monitors] Trajectory Calibrator” of the
monitoring centers at airports the world over promise enormous business
opportunities. Uprooting
hijacking, striking terrorism worldwide and defeating the evil by enlightened
means manifest the intelligence of the civilized human community.
The present invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment thereof and it is understood that [there] this is not a restrict