I. Background of the invention
Since
February 2003 years, SARS infection has wreaks havoc in China, Hong Kong and many other countries in the world. Its effects had send repercussion throughout the entire
international society. The death
rate has been high and the Chinese and western medical social were quite
helpless about this. So China, Taiwan , Hong Kong, Singapore and Canadian etc.
were listed on travel warning district by World Health Organization and
pecuniary loss surmount thousand a hundred million, Mankind is faced with death
threat.
Knowing
how to treat the SARS virus infection had became the top most urgent matter in
the Southeast Asia. During this urgent and difficult period of time, the
inventors had came up with a innovative medical scheme to save lives, the newest of medical scheme is “Surface
Treatment of SARS-Infected Lungs”.
Due to the urgency
of saving lives, the draft was fax to the Hong Kong
chief executive and Chinese leader on 15 May 2003. The English version was also
forwarded to “WHO-Padey”, “WHO-Liden” by Mey-Verme, Mrs Cnia (WDC) and the
leaders who were holding the Geneva meeting on 20 May 2003.
About the functions of the lungs.
The lungs
mainly serve to redistribute the blood from the right ventricle via the lung
artery to various lung sub-arteries and capillary vessels in the alveoli, thus
achieving gas exchange introducing oxygen and releasing carbon dioxide. Then
the blood returns from the lung veins to the left atrium and mixed at a certain
proportion in the right ventricle. That is the big circulation of
oxygen-containing blood in the arteries providing energy for the body! (Fig. 1.)
Here the medium for gas exchange is not special, just like pumping
the air to the bottom of a fish jar to produce bubbles and the oxygen enters
the water by rubbing against the external spherical surfaces of the rising
bubbles. Our alveoli work like the bubbles in the fish jar and have a large
surface area for air contact. The contact area of the dense alveolus tissues in
the lungs is up to 70 m2! Tiny blood vessels are spread over the
surfaces of these tissues to complete “gas exchange” or, in other words,
pulmonary ventilation, via distribution through the blood, interstitial layer
and cells. That is the basic idea of the lungs according to modern
medicine.
On the medical history, sort of Lung diseases have been numerous. Tuberculosis used to be an
infectious disease difficuit to cure.
However, it can be cured 100% thanks to the discovery of multiple
antibiotics. Infant pneumonia is also a common disease, not to speak of
pneumococcus. This article describes how to treat SARS.
First, treatment by the traditional
Chinese medicine. This method mainly relies on absorption function of the
intestines and stomach, which impedes the development of the traditional
Chinese medicine. Traditional Chinese prescriptions only help the intestines
and stomach to share the burden of the liver, thereby improving only our
immunity.
However, the prevailing SARS cures
at present are based on Western medicine. The Chinese mainland advocates such
antibiotics like tetracycline and erythromycin while Hong Kong regards ribavirin
and steroid as effective SARS-containing medicines, but in Canada, which had
used Ribavirin for a long time, has now stopped using it because it may have
serious side effects.
However, no matter how to, the antibiotics is being absorbed by the intestines and stomach or
injected via the veins, they cannot change the subject of the method of
transporting anti-bacterium factors in the blood. We call this method blood
therapy. Because , many elements in the anti-bacterium factors cannot be absorbed by
the intestines and stomach, so the Western medicine takes the lead by this
therapy.
That is why the medical circles are
focusing on how to improve the efficiency of the “anti-bacterium factors”.
But, as shown in Fig.2, if the injection point
is found in the arteries of the lungs, then the “blood therapy” may become much
more effective, as proven by the noticeable flow ratio of the artery and lung
circulation. SARS-containing clinical practice is thus more effective. However,
we want to point out that the efficiency direction of the “anti-bacterium blood
therapy” of SARS is wrong.
As there is a need to define air as an interface, so SARS infection is a kind of surface
ulcerous infection. This is a new medical definition, which is likely to
revolutionize lung treatment! Therefore we use a familiar industrial
term “surface treatment” and to include a technique of supersonic treatment. This is like
applying purple liquid medicine to the ulcerous skin which is much more
effective than “blood therapy” using any antibiotic.
Up to this point, we can
optimistically predict that once the “surface treatment” technique which
depends on various antibiotics recommended has found clinic applications, then
a SARS patients need only to go to the hospital to have their lungs washed, and
SARS will no longer be fatal. At the same time it can also be effective
for other pneumonia diseases.
Let’s learn something about the
physical properties of SARS before dealing with the subject matter of this
article—SARS treatment:
1.
Fig. 3 is downloaded
from the Internet. SARS virus is smaller than 50 nanometers. SARS virus has
numerous crown-like developments, making it absorptive. Overcoming such
absorption is significant for the “surface treatment” technique recommended in
this article. When we contract bacterium-induced faucitis, we just wet our
throat with brine and the pain immediately subsides, because some bacteria are “washed
away” by brine, as proven by observing under an electronic endoscope. This
traditional inflammation relief method through brine is well-known
to all. Inspired by this idea, I think such a simple method can also prevent
SARS virus from entering the lungs through the mouth and throat.
2. Super-small and super-light virus is
visible only through an electronic microscope and the 75-nm N95 standard
respirators we use cannot keep out SARS virus, so SARS virus spreads by means
of the tiny water droplets and dust particles in the air. In view of that, we
can work out a series of effective preventive measures like the “surface
treatment” method recommended in this article.
III. Five lung “surface treatment” methods
The
method of antibiotic gasification and absorption is not new. This method is
effective at the early stage of infection and may serve as a preventive measure
before and after medical operation. This method presupposes that the antibiotic
in question must be dissolvable in 37℃ water.
The
method of massage and sternutation is more suitably called physical therapy. It
works like this: pressing the alveoli by applying force on the lungs and
detaching the virus from the cell wall of the alveoli. Facing the nose toward
the sun may help to induce sternutation, which is recommendable at the early
stage of infection or as a preventive measure. Therefore sunlight
sternutation device will be popular on the market. Sternutation is the best
exercise for the chest and lungs, and sneezing three times a day is good for
senior citizens. The benefits of such an exercise are hardly known but it is a
good piece of news for people with weak lungs. This method is just preventive
but not effective in detaching the highly absorptive SARS virus.
Discussion
3
Taking
out and sterilizing lung lobes is not just a dream. It involves the invention
and clinical application of external blood oxygen adding device. This method
includes liquid medicine submersion and temperature difference treatment, the
latter being the latest medical concept not only suitable for lung patients but
also for cancer patients and others. Further exploration of this method may
help to replace antibiotic blood therapy with this method:
a.
External liquid medicine submersion is more flexible that internal
liquid medicine submersion. There are
a few or no Liquid
medicines that do not damage alveolus tissues. However, an effective liquid
medicine
for lung lobe
submersion will be more effective and attractive if combined with supersonic
wave.
b. What is temperature difference treatment? The organs and virus under treatment
have difference
physiological temperature
curves. Temperature difference effect is achieved by selecting a temperature
point which is fatal to
viruses but from which the organs treated can revive. It is not important
whether
this method is recorded
in medical literature, but the method proves simple, the essential point is the
revival rate of the organ
under treatment. This is therefore a highly recommended method.
Local quick freezing and
sterilizing of lung lobes is also based on temperature differences but
technically it is an improvement from the above three discussions. Taking out
lung lobes without cutting off arteries and veins may minimize the damage to
the organ and inter-organ contact, making this method practical. While it is
difficult to carry out on Lungs, it is feasible for “semi-detached organs”
like. The root of the problem is that the quick-freezing equipment involved is
not as simple as an ammonia cyclic refrigerator. The clinic freezing device
must work in contact mode and is capable of lowering the temperature of an
organ of about 1 kg to -30-50℃ within 5 ~ 10 seconds. Many
medical fields are gone up and breakthroughs will rely on this kind of
technical accomplishment, that is made in accordance to the trade circle of
science and technology requirement.
Discussion
5
Injecting
sterilizer into lung lobes is the subject matter of surface treatment technique
of this article. I do not specialize in medicine but
just a little medically minded. Inspired by the idea of relieving oral and
throat inflammation with brine solution, I managed to find some suitable
solvent and sterilizer, but it has to undergo clinical test. But I’m sure that so
long as some qualified chemist proposes and there is an adequate range of
solvents and sterilizers, SARS will be overcome!
IIII. O1 Therapy for “surface
treatment” of the lungs
The
sterilizing liquid injected into lung lobes is the surface treatment liquid for
O1 therapy of the lungs. The formal name for this liquid is Per fluoro
chemicals (PFC) and the sterilizer is ozone.
This
method of introducing supersonic wave with sterilizing liquid may make SARS
virus less absorptive and quickly clear viruses in the lungs. This new and
practical therapy works like bombing the SARS virus with smart cruise missiles.
The missile is single oxygen (O1) separated from ozone, hence “O1 Therapy”!
The effect of the
regular antibiotic therapy currently used is limited in that this therapy entails
blood exchange, and it is also limited by blood density. For example 50nm-minus
SARS virus is hidden in the middle layer that is inaccessible via the capillary
vessels, so the mortality rate of this “blood therapy” is still over 10%. The
“blood therapy” of Western medicine has reached its maximum potential. On the
contrary, “O1 therapy” is highly effective and is likely to reduce the death
rate to zero.
1.
Selection of PFE solvent;
2. Properties of ozone sterilizer;
3. Lung “surface treatment” design flow;
4. Test with animal lung;
5. Special
of operating table.
1.
Selection
of PFE solvent
PFC
comes to our mind when we select a liquid medium for cleaning alveoli. Clinical
cases are available for PFC breathing technique. We can rely completely on such
an effective sterilizer or antibiotic to kill SARS virus. PFC has the
characteristics:
1. No
color, taste or smell, not poisonous;
2. Low surface tensile strength, not dissolvable in water or fat;
3. High dissolving coefficient for oxygen and carbon dioxide, high density
and low solubility, higher dissolving coefficient for ozone;
4. Volatile under indoor temperature and body temperature, does not
changeable into other matter via catabolism;
With
the above features, PFC qualifies as a lung surface treatment liquid. It has a dynamic function. On the one hand, oxygen can pass
through it to achieve constant gas exchange in the lungs, and on the other
hand, the liquid PFC can permeate any alveoli, so that the O1 element in PFC
can freely trace SARS virus. The volatility of PFC ensures that no sequela will
appear. What is more, PFC can also clean the lungs of damaged cells, cell
fragments resulting from inflammation, and SARS virus residuals.
2. Characteristics of ozone sterilizer
1. The molecule formula of ozone is O3, which is an allotrope of
high-energy oxygen and is dissolvable in water and various liquid chemicals;
2. Low-density ozone is colorless and smells like a special grass. It
is blue at high temperature and its density is 1.5 times that of air;
3. Ozone sterilizes by releasing single oxygen atom to oxidize and
damage the cell of the virus, leaving pure O2, which is beneficial to the
lungs;
4. Ozone dissolved in water sterilizes more forcibly and quickly, and
it is dissolvable in liquid PFC;
5. When the density of ozone exceeds a certain limit, its sterilizing
function is just a matter of seconds;
Therefore,
ozone is a good choice as an alveoli sterilizer. The following figures are
cited from world-recognized experiment documentation for ozone sterilizing.
|
Ozone sterilizing |
Density |
Time |
Types of viruses and pathogens
|
Sterilizing efficiency |
|
10mg/m3 |
20 mins |
Type-B hepatitis surface antigen (HbsAg) |
99.99% |
|
|
0.5ppm |
5 mins |
Type-A flu virus |
99% |
|
|
0.13mg/L |
30 seconds |
Poliomyelitis virus type I (PVI) |
100% |
|
|
40μg/L |
20 seconds |
Coliphage ms2 |
98% |
|
|
0.25mg/L |
1 minute |
SA-H and human-wheel virus type 2
|
99.60% |
|
|
* 12.6mg/L |
4 minutes |
Coronaviridae |
100% |
|
|
4mg/L |
3 minutes |
HIV |
100% |
|
|
8mg/m3 |
10 minutes |
Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, and other pathogens |
99.85% |
* Red
indicates every liter of lung surface treatment solution contains 12.6mg ozone,
which may serves as a reference when we consider the test dosage of ozone.
3.
Lung
“surface treatment” flow
The
treatment flow takes the treatment for example of the right lung, while reserving
the breath of the left lung for the time being. The final purpose is to treat
both lungs at the same time. Process 3 can only be used only after process 4.
Test it with animal lung, before applying it on human. It must be noted that
the test with animal lung is intended to prove that it applies to process 3,
the human body treatment. The advantage of the reverse sequence is time saving.
a.
Surface treatment clinic (must be professional anesthetist except for
bio-chemical test of body energy)
diagram : ( Fig. 4)
b.
Surface treatment clinic scheme: (Fig.5)
4. Test with animal
lung
Test
with animal lung includes two stages: test with one lung of the baby pig and
test with both lungs. This process simulates process 3, as specified below:
a. Inject pure PFC into
three without virus influence of baby pig
|
Baby pig |
Pure PFC injection 10 mins |
Pure PFC injection 30 mins |
Pure PFC injection 120 mins
|
||||||
|
|
Change of blood oxygen
amount |
Heart pulses |
Symptom description |
Change of blood oxygen
amount |
Heart pulses |
Symptom description |
Change of blood oxygen
amount |
Heart pulses |
Symptom description |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Inject 12.6mg/L
PFC into three virus-free pig to test its reaction to high-density ozone:
|
Baby pig |
Pure PFC injection 10 mins |
Pure PFC injection 30 mins | ||||